Funded by EU MUR Italia Domani University of Naples L'Orientale University of Messina
Empirical analysis of Fosso Imperatore Industrial Park

Studying Phase

Empirical analysis of Fosso Imperatore Industrial Park

Research Activity 2

Overview

RA2 transitions from theoretical exploration to empirical contextual understanding, focusing on the specific characteristics, dynamics, and potential of the Fosso Imperatore Industrial Park in Nocera Inferiore, Campania. This “Studying” phase involves defining the industrial system boundaries, interpreting the constituent elements as a biological system in which actors operate (produce, use-consume, etc.) and relate with other actors and the local environment. The mapping of the pre-existing flows and the related balances complete the functional picture of the IP analysed. The activity is linked to the keywords “Local Development” and “Circular Economy”.

Data collection methodology integrates indirect sources (documents, reports, datasets) with direct investigative methods (on-site visits, interviews, questionnaires), SWOT Analysis, and Material Flow Analysis (MFA).

Duration: Year 1 — Bimesters 2 to 5

Status: Completed

Lead: RU2 — University of Messina

Key Objectives

Assessment of Resource Flows

Assessment of the most relevant flows at territorial (meso-) and local level (micro), establishing material exchange patterns through Material Flow Analysis and quantitative assessment of waste streams within the Fosso Imperatore Industrial Park.

Stakeholder Identification

Identification of the stakeholders operating in the IP and their interactions modes, mapping all actors involved in the ecosystem including firms, local authorities, waste management operators, and community groups.

SWOT Analysis

Identification of strengths, weaknesses, criticisms and opportunity for the linear-circular transition, assessing the IP's potential for circular economy implementation through a comprehensive strategic assessment.

Outcomes

1. Resource Flow Assessment

Material Flow Analysis using Python scripts with a top-down approach utilizing ISPRA and ISTAT databases revealed the park generates approximately 2,969 tons of potentially recyclable waste annually, with plastics representing the dominant stream (1,775 tons). Three sectors (plastics, food processing, metal products) account for the vast majority of waste. Sankey diagrams were developed to visualize material flows across the most relevant waste-generating firms, providing a comprehensive metabolic profile of the industrial park at both micro-territorial and meso-local levels.

Outcome 1 diagram
Figure 1: Sankey Diagram visualizing material flows of the most relevant waste-generating firms

2. Stakeholder Mapping & Network Analysis

Network analysis identified 47 potential symbiotic matches based on material compatibility and geographic proximity. The analysis revealed significant implementation barriers: companies preferentially select external waste management pathways despite internal exchange potential, while information asymmetry, limited trust between firms, and regulatory complexity hinder cooperation. The relationship between municipal administration and businesses shows both collaborative and conflictual elements, including conflicts of competence with ZES (Special Economic Zone). Citizen groups (e.g., ‘Rete NO PIP’ network with 552 signatures) contest industrial expansion.

Outcome 2 diagram
Figure 2: Network analysis showing industrial symbiosis potential among firms

3. Strategic SWOT Matrix

The strategic assessment identifies the park’s moderate production diversification (agri-food, mechanics, scaffolds, textile) and service infrastructure as foundational strengths for a circular transition. Critical weaknesses are linked to information asymmetry, limited inter-firm trust, and conflicts of competence with institutional actors. Major opportunities lie in digital technologies for overcoming information barriers and closing local resource loops. These potential gains are counterbalanced by threats such as citizen resistance to industrial expansion, regulatory complexity, and the challenge of coordinating multiple independent firms within a shared territorial framework.

Outcome 3 diagram
Figure 3: SWOT Analysis of the circular transition potential

Deliverable D.2

Evolutive taxonomy contexts Map; Integrated Context Analysis Report — A context analysis (and map) based on RA1 objectives integrating structural-morphological dimensions assessment and flows analysis.

Previous

← RA1 — Literature Review

Next

RA3 — Development Model →